Original Article by Chris Beardsley, S&C Research columnist can be found here.
Getting strong is really, really important.
In fact, strength is probably the single most important thing for many athletes.
But strength is very hard to measure with a single test.
Some people score very highly on one test of strength, but less highly on another similar test, even when it involves the same muscle groups.
Similarly, training for one particular strength test (such as a 1RM back squat) will make you stronger at the test exercise, but not necessarily increase your force production in another exercise, or during a sporting movement.
This is because strength is specific.
How is strength specific?
Strength gains are greater when tested under the same conditions as performed in training. There are 8 ways in which strength is specific:
- Muscle action (eccentric or concentric)
- Velocity (fast or slow)
- Repetition range (maximum strength or muscular endurance)
- Range of motion (full or partial)
- Degree of stability (stable or unstable)
- External load type (constant load or accommodating resistance)
- Force vector (vertical or horizontal)
- Muscle group
Maximizing the effectiveness of a strength training program means designing it to fit the specificgoal you want to achieve.
How much difference does specificity make?
The impact of specificity on strength training is not a small detail.
It is huge.
Compare the effects of training with eccentric muscle actions, compared to training with concentric muscle actions. Using elbow flexion exercise, Vikne et al. (2006) showed that gains in eccentric 1RM after eccentric training are more than twice as large as those after concentric training.
Or compare the effects of training with fast or slow velocities.
Both high and low velocity training can produce gains in high-velocity and low-velocity strength, but the gains are velocity-specific (Coyle et al. 1981).
Or compare the effects of training with heavy or light loads.
Both heavy and light loads can increase muscular strength, but the gains in maximum strength are almost always much greater when using heavy loads. Similarly, the gains in repetition strength (muscular endurance) are usually much greater when using lighter loads (Schoenfeld et al. 2015).
Or compare the effects of training with partial or full ranges of motion.
When partials do improve full range of motion strength, it is almost never as much as full range of motion training. On the other hand, they usually produce larger gains in partial range of motion strength (Rhea et al. 2016).
Or compare the effects of training under different stability conditions.
An easy way to explore the effects of stability is to look at strength gains after training on machines that use fixed bar paths or on machines that use cables to allow freedom of movement (Cacchio et al. 2008). Strength gains are totally different between the two types of machine.
Or compare the effects of training with different external load types.
Pneumatic resistance provides a constant external force, while free weights involve a force that is greatest at the start of the exercise and smallest at the end, because of inertia. Training with pneumatic resistance leads to greater gains in pneumatic resistance strength, than in free weight strength, while training with free weights leads to greater gains in free weight strength, than in pneumatic resistance strength (Frost et al. 2016).
Strength gains are specific in several ways, and knowing about these ways will help you to develop the types of strength that transfer best to sport.
Why are strength gains specific (part 1)?
Many people get confused about the relationship between muscle size and strength, and this leads them to make extreme statements in one direction or another.
Some people think that muscle size and strength have little connection with each other. They believe that it is possible to increase strength substantially and over a long-term period of time without large gains in muscle size.
Other people argue that strength is almost entirely a function of size, and that it is impossible to increase strength without hypertrophy.
In fact, the truth is halfway between these extremes. Although muscle size is the single most important predictor of strength, other factors also have an impact. This is apparent even in cross-sectional studies (Trezise et al. 2016).
The remainder of the difference is probably accounted for by many different peripheral and central factors (not just neural ones, like you might read in an old textbook), including:
- muscle fascicle length
- muscle pennation angle
- moment arm length
- single fiber contractile function
- lateral force transmission
- neural drive to the agonists
- coactivation of antagonists
And these factors are also what makes strength gains specific.
Why are strength gains specific (part 2)?
The specific nature of strength gains is produced by lots of small peripheral and central adaptations that interact with each other.
Across the fitness industry, you will find that most people simply refer to vague “neural adaptations” whenever specificity or the Specific Adaptation to Imposed Demand (SAID) is raised.
The reality is much more complex.
Specific gains in strength can occur through many different mechanisms, some of which are neural and some of which are due to changes within the muscle itself.
Let’s take a look at the mechanisms underlying the most important ways in which strength is specific.
#1. Muscle action
Strength gains are specific to the muscle action you use.
Eccentric training produces greater gains in eccentric strength than in concentric strength.
Although many people will argue back and forth about the hypertrophic potential of eccentric training, the specificity effect is not caused by differences in the amount of hypertrophy produced.
In fact, it probably happens partly because of increased extracellular matrix and titin content, which increase passive force production, and partly because of neural adaptations that are specific to lengthening muscle actions.
Strength gains are specific to the velocity that you use.
High-velocity (light load) training produces greater gains in strength at high speeds than at low speeds.
Velocity-specificity is confusing, because some very influential research suggested that “intent” was the main factor driving velocity-specific strength gains, and not actual bar speed. However, this is probably not true, and both “intent” and actual speed likely contribute to velocity-specificity.
Velocity-specificity probably happens for many reasons, including greater increases in muscle fascicle length, larger increases in single fiber velocity, greater increases in early phase neural drive, more suppressed co-activation, and bigger improvements in co-ordination, compared to low-velocity (heavy load) training.
#3. Range of motion
Strength gains are specific to the range of motion you use.
Partial range of motion exercises produce greater gains in strength at partial ranges of motion than at full ranges of motion.
Partial range of motion exercises probably improve strength at short muscle lengths because of joint-angle specific increases in neural drive. In contrast, full range of motion exercises likely improve strength at long muscle lengths because of specific gains in regional hypertrophy.
Strength gains are specific to the load that you use.
Heavy loads lead to greater gains in maximum strength, while lighter loads (performed to failure) lead to greater gains in repetition strength (muscular endurance).
Greater gains in maximum strength with heavy loads likely occur because of more relevant increases in inter-muscular coordination in multi-joint exercises, greater changes in single fiber contractile properties, greater increases in lateral force transmission, and larger increases in neural drive.
Greater gains in repetition strength likely occur with lighter loads because of larger improvements in capillarization, and changes buffering capacity, and in the rate of ion (Na+, K+, Ca²+) transport.
Strength gains are specific to the amount of stability you use.
Free weight strength training leads to greater strength gains on free weight exercises than on machine exercises.
Stability exists on a continuum with machines at one end, and lifting free weights while balancing on a stability ball at the other end. Lifting free weights while standing on the ground or lying on a bench sits somewhere in the middle.
Strength gains are specific to the type of stability used in training. This is because the need to balance in any less-than-perfectly stable environment affects the co-ordination patterns of muscles in multi-joint exercises, increasing both synergist and antagonist activation.
Training in an unstable environment leads to reduced antagonist activation and increased synergist activation, as the more complex nature of the movement is learned. These changes leads to a more efficient pattern of muscular contractions for those exact conditions of stability.
And this increases strength in a stability-specific way.
What about the other ways in which strength is specific?
As mentioned earlier, strength is specific in at least 8 ways and not just 5 ways. However, the other 3 ways are specific mostly because of the way in which they produce changes in the big 5 ways.
External load type (constant load or accommodating resistance) produces specific strength gains because of changes in joint angle-specific (range of motion-specific) strength and velocity-specific strength.
Force vector (vertical or horizontal) also produces specific strength gains because of changes in joint angle-specific (range of motion-specific) strength, and because it tends to develop certain muscle groups more than others.
Muscle group specific strength gains arise where an exercise trains a muscle group in a non-specific way, which then transfer to completely different joint actions involving the same muscles. A good example of this might be training the hamstrings in knee flexor exercises (such as Nordic hamstring curls or lying leg curls), which then transfers to hip extension strength.
What does this mean in practice?
Getting strong for sport means analyzing the requirements of a sporting movement, and figuring out how force is produced in terms of muscle action (eccentric or concentric), speed (high or low velocity), range of motion (point of peak contraction), load (maximum or repetition strength), and stability (stable or less stable).
Matching the features of sporting movement with the goals of your strength training program will lead to better sport-specific strength gains than doing a basic strength training program.
Many coaches have already figured this out.
The importance of eccentric strength for sprinting and change of direction is why eccentric training with flywheels is suddenly so popular. The success of velocity-based training points to the superior transfer of high-velocity strength gains to sporting movement. And partial squats are having a comeback for developing sprinting and jumping abilities.
It is only a matter of time before the rest of the industry catches up.
- Bloomquist, K., Langberg, H., Karlsen, S., Madsgaard, S., Boesen, M., & Raastad, T. (2013). Effect of range of motion in heavy load squatting on muscle and tendon adaptations. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 113(8), 2133-2142.
- Cacchio, A., Don, R., Ranavolo, A., Guerra, E., McCaw, S. T., Procaccianti, R., & Santilli, V. (2008). Effects of 8-week strength training with two models of chest press machines on muscular activity pattern and strength. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 18(4), 618.
- Coyle, E. F., Feiring, D. C., Rotkis, T. C., Cote, R. W., Roby, F. B., Lee, W., & Wilmore, J. H. (1981). Specificity of power improvements through slow and fast isokinetic training. Journal of Applied Physiology, 51(6), 1437-1442.
- Frost, D. M., Bronson, S., Cronin, J. B., & Newton, R. U. (2016). Changes in Maximal Strength, Velocity, and Power After 8 Weeks of Training With Pneumatic or Free Weight Resistance. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 30(4), 934-944.
- Hartmann, H., Wirth, K., Klusemann, M., Dalic, J., Matuschek, C., & Schmidtbleicher, D. (2012). Influence of squatting depth on jumping performance. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 26(12), 3243.
- Rhea, M. R., Kenn, J. G., Peterson, M. D., Massey, D., Simão, R., Marin, P. J. & Krein, D. (2016). Joint-Angle Specific Strength Adaptations Influence Improvements in Power in Highly Trained Athletes. Human Movement, 17(1), 43-49.
- Schoenfeld, B. J., Peterson, M. D., Ogborn, D., Contreras, B., & Sonmez, G. T. (2015). Effects of low-vs. high-load resistance training on muscle strength and hypertrophy in well-trained men. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 29(10), 2954-2963.
- Trezise, J., Collier, N., & Blazevich, A. J. (2016). Anatomical and neuromuscular variables strongly predict maximum knee extension torque in healthy men. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 116(6), 1159-1177.
- Vikne, H., Refsnes, P. E., Ekmark, M., Medbø, J. I., Gundersen, V., & Gundersen, K. (2006). Muscular performance after concentric and eccentric exercise in trained men. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 38(10), 1770-1781.